Retroperitoneal fasciae as barriers for nerve and arterial passages connecting the retroperitoneal region to the peritoneal organs.

The fascia of the pancreatic head is referred to as the retropancreatic fascia of Treitz, and that of the body and tail of the pancreas is named the retropancreatic fascia of Toldt. However, the spatial relationship between the nerves, fascia, and the distribution of the fascia on the dorsal side of the pancreas remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the distribution of these fasciae and elucidate the spatial relationship between the nerves and arteries connecting the retroperitoneal space and the peritoneal organs by studying eight cadavers using macroscopic anatomical examination, wide-range serial sectioning, and three-dimensional reconstruction. The fasciae of Treitz and Toldt converge caudally to the root of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), forming a narrower gap around the roots of the celiac trunk and SMA than in the celiac plexus. The fasciae eventually get closer to each other, and the boundary between them becomes obscured, providing coverage to the anterior surface of the aorta between the SMA and the inferior mesenteric artery. The celiac plexus does not penetrate the fascia but converges before spreading into the pancreas. Similarly, the arteries pass through this gap in the fasciae. Our findings suggest that the retroperitoneal space and peritoneal organs are connected through a narrow no-fascia area, with the distribution of the fascia relating to nervous and vascular pathways. Our findings reveal that the distribution of the avascular plane may provide a crucial anatomical foundation for abdominal digestive organ surgery by reducing bleeding volume and determining the dissection region.

Efficacy and Safety of Celiac Plexus Neurolysis Versus Splanchnic Nerve Neurolysis in the Management of Abdominal Cancer Pain: A Meta-analysis of 359 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Splanchnic nerve neurolysis (SNN) is commonly used as an alternative pain control technique to celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) in patients with distortion of anatomy, but the analgesic effect and relative risks of the 2 procedures remain controversial in general condition. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the pain condition, safety, and symptom burden of SNN compared with CPN. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of neurolysis therapy for intractable cancer-related abdominal pain. METHODS: A systematic search was performed for randomized controlled trials comparing SNN and CPN using the PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata Version 15.0. Outcomes included pain condition, opioid consumption, adverse effects, quality of life (QOL), and survival rate. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated for continuous outcomes with its corresponding 95% CI. LIMITATIONS: Study limitations include challenges to make subgroup analysis by intervention measures and addressing inevitable heterogeneity. Larger studies are needed for survival rates and further insights. RESULTS: Seven studies involving 359 patients were included. No significant difference was found in pain condition at 2 weeks [SMD = 0.75, 95% CI (-0.25, 1.74), P > 0.05], 2 months [SMD = 1.10, 95% CI (-0.21, 2.40), P > 0.05] and 6 months [SMD = 0.53, 95% CI (-0.02, 1.08), P > 0.05] between SNN and CPN. Opioid consumption was comparable at 2 weeks [SMD = 0.57, 95% CI (-1.21, 2.34), P > 0.05] and one month [SMD = 0.37, 95% CI (-1.33, 2.07), P > 0.05]. However, SNN was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the opioid consumption at 2 months postoperatively [SMD = 0.99, 95% CI (0.68, 1.30), P < 0.05]. A systematic review was performed for adverse effects and QOL. CONCLUSIONS: Our evidence supports that the analgesic effect of SNN is equivalent to that of CPN, independent of changes in the anatomical structure of the abdominal nerve plexus. SNN requires less use of opioids at 2 months and does not show greater improvement in pain burden compared to CPN.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Pain Management.

The diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer has become a standard role for the endoscopic oncologist. Pancreatic cancer can produce disabling abdominal pain, and the medical management of this pain is often challenging. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis and celiac ganglia neurolysis serve as an alternative or adjunct for pain control in these patients. There remains a great deal of practice variability with regard to techniques and approaches. This article summarizes the latest scientific evidence and highlights contemporary best practice advice for these procedures.

Efficacy and Safety of Celiac Plexus Neurolysis in the Treatment of Chronic Pain Secondary to Oncological Pathology of the Upper Hemiabdomen: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objectives: The management of chronic pain among patients with abdominal cancer is complex; against that, the neurolysis of the celiac plexus (CPN) is the best technique at the moment to determine the efficacy and safety in the treatment of chronic pain secondary to oncological pathology of the upper abdomen. Material and Methods: This was a systematic review of controlled clinical trials between 2000 and 2021, in the sources MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Three independent evaluators analysed the results of the bibliographical research. The quality of the studies was assessed with the Jadad scale and the mean difference (95% confidence interval) and heterogeneity of the studies (I2) were calculated with Review Manager 5.3. Results: Seven hundred and forty-four publications were identified, including 13 studies in the qualitative synthesis and three studies in the quantitative synthesis. No difference was found in the decrease in pain intensity between 1 and 12 weeks after the intervention, comparing the experimental group with the control (P > 0.05). The adverse effects related to neurolysis were not serious and transitory, mentioning the most frequent adverse effects and reporting a percentage between 21% and 67% (with 17% for echoendoscopic neurolysis and 49% for percutaneous neurolysis). Conclusion: Celiac plexus neurolysis for the treatment of severe chronic pain secondary to oncological pathology in the upper hemiabdomen produces similar pain relief as conventional pharmacological analgesic treatment. It is a safe analgesic technique since the complications are mild and transitory.

Early versus delayed computed tomography-guided celiac plexus neurolysis for palliative pain management in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Introduction: Abdominal and back pain is the most frequent symptom in patients with pancreatic cancer, with pain management being extremely challenging. This study aimed to evaluate pain control, opioid consumption, pain-interfered quality of life, and survival after early and delayed computed tomography (CT)-guided celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN). Methods: A retrospective analysis of pancreatic cancer patients receiving CPN for pain (n = 56) between June 2018 and June 2021 was done. The patients were grouped as early group (n = 22) and delayed group (n = 34) on the basis of the presence of persistent refractory pain according to expert consensus on refractory cancer pain. Results: Both groups were comparable in demographic characteristics and baseline pain conditions measured using the numeric rating scale (5.77 ± 1.23 vs. 6.27 ± 1.21; p = 0.141). The pain scores were significantly reduced in both groups; early CPN resulted in significantly lower scores from 3 to 5 months. The opioid consumption gradually decreased to a minimum at 2 weeks but increased at 1 month (35.56 ± 30.14 mg and 50.48 ± 47.90 mg, respectively); significantly larger consumption from 2 to 4 months was seen in the delayed group. The total pain interference was lower than baseline in all patients, with significant improvement after early CPN in sleep, appetite, enjoyment of life, and mood. The average survival time of the two groups was comparable. Conclusion: Early application of CT-guided CPN for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer may help reduce pain exacerbation and opioids consumption, without influencing the survival.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis in pancreatic cancer-associated pain: different technical approaches in three challenging cases

Abdominal pain is severe in the vast majority of patients with pancreatic cancer. In some cases, chronic use of analgesics markedly reduces quality of life due to side effects. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis is a procedure that controls cancerassociated pain in this population and consists of injecting a neurolytic agent around or within the celiac plexus. In this report, we present three cases with different technical approaches for celiac plexus neurolysis.

El cáncer de páncreas se puede presentar con dolor abdominal intenso, siendo necesario el uso de analgésicos a largo plazo en muchos de los pacientes. Sin embargo, estos medicamentos pueden tener efectos adversos que finalmente reducen la calidad de vida de los pacientes. La neurólisis del plexo celíaco guiada por ecoendoscopia es un procedimiento que controla el dolor asociado a este tipo de neoplasia y consiste en inyectar un agente neurolítico en o alrededor del plexo celíaco. Presentamos tres casos en los cuales se realizan diferentes técnicas de abordaje terapéutico.

Possible Transient Anterior Spinal Artery Syndrome After a Celiac Plexus Neurolytic Block.

Celiac plexus blocks have been utilized to treat chronic abdominal pain of various etiologies that are refractory to medication management. This procedure is considered relatively safe; however, one rare complication is anterior spinal artery syndrome, which can result in temporary or permanent paralysis of the lower extremities. A 67-year-old male with a history of metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma and chronic pain refractory to high doses of opioids presented for a celiac plexus neurolytic block. The block was performed successfully with a test block containing 2% lidocaine and 0.5% bupivacaine, after which neurolysis with alcohol was completed. The patient had a syncopal episode in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), which resolved with fluid resuscitation without requiring advanced cardiovascular life support (ACLS). He was then discharged. On the evening of discharge, the patient had progressive lower extremity weakness to the point where he was unable to walk even with significant assistance from a family member. He went to the emergency department where a complete spine MRI was done which did not show any spinal cord defect. His physical exam showed preserved proprioception and vibration sensation with upper motor neuron exam signs. The remainder of his sensory exam was inconsistent with both reported intact sensation to pinprick and temperature with intermittently reported hyperalgesia in his lower extremities. Over the next day of admission, his weakness slowly improved. Unfortunately, the patient developed a bowel perforation during hospitalization that was non-operable, and he passed away on hospital day five. This patient likely had anterior spinal artery vasospasm causing temporary lower extremity weakness. Given his overall debility, his physical exam was difficult, although he had intact proprioception and vibration sensation with upper motor neuron exam findings suggestive of an anterior cord process. Vasospasm could be secondary to needle placement near the artery of Adamkiewicz, alcohol, or epinephrine. This case emphasizes the importance of recognizing anterior spinal artery syndrome despite its rarity in patients undergoing celiac plexus neurolysis. Regardless of the rarity of various complications, it is imperative that physicians discuss potential devastating complications of procedures with patients to allow for individualized decision-making. Additionally, there should be a low threshold for overnight admission after celiac plexus neurolytic blocks in patients with severe underlying systemic disease processes.

Topical Diclofenac to Manage Opioid-Refractory Pain in a Rare Pancreatic Fibrosarcoma.

Pancreatic cancer is often diagnosed at an advanced stage and is frequently associated with severe pain. Traditional pain management in this condition may be improved with the use of topical diclofenac. A 39-year-old man with advanced pancreatic fibrosarcoma metastatic to the thoracic spine presented to the hospital with severe abdominal pain refractory to escalating doses of opioids. A celiac plexus block produced significant, yet inadequate, pain reduction. Satisfactory pain control and opioid de-escalation were ultimately achieved with the application of topical diclofenac gel to an area of bony metastasis. This case illustrates the potential for pain control using topical diclofenac in patients with pancreatic soft tissue tumors and vertebral metastases. Topical diclofenac may exert antitumoral effects and targeted application may improve absorption, leading to improved pain control. The use of topical diclofenac for pain management in metastatic pancreatic cancer presents an interesting tool that should be considered in similar cases.

Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) as an Alternative for Celiac Plexus Blocks: Expanding ESPB Indications for Mesenteric Ischemia Relief.

Mesenteric ischemia is a severe condition associated with abdominal pain which often requires multimodal analgesia, including opioids or sympathetic blocks such as celiac plexus blocks. The erector spinae plane (ESPB) has emerged as a potentially effective alternative for managing pain in various surgical and non-surgical conditions. This case report explores the use of ultrasound-guided ESPB as a novel approach to pain management in a patient with acute on chronic mesenteric ischemia. A 70-year-old male with a history of mesenteric ischemia and multiple comorbidities presented with worsening diffuse abdominal pain. Despite medical and surgical treatment, the patient required a high dose of opioids for pain control. Bilateral ESPBs with continuous infusions were performed at the T6 level under ultrasound guidance. The patient reported immediate and complete relief from abdominal pain following the block, with a significant drop in the pain score. The use of opioids was significantly reduced. This case report demonstrates the potential benefits of ultrasound-guided ESPB as an alternative to traditional pain management techniques in patients with mesenteric ischemia. ESPB may provide safe, simple, and effective analgesia, reducing the need for high-dose opioids and their associated side effects. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and explore the broader application of ESPB in the management of mesenteric ischemia pain.

Persistent hypotension and other complications of celiac plexus neurolysis: A case report and literature review.

Key Clinical Message: Persistent hypotension is a rare complication of celiac plexus neurolysis. It is important to know what are the main and rare complications and how to treat these in patients who undergo CPN. Abstract: Celiac plexus neurolysis is an effective treatment for visceral abdominal pain in oncological patients. Although it rarely has complications, some side effects may occur. A patient with visceral abdominal pain who developed long-lasting orthostatic hypotension and was treated with the use of corticosteroids after a neurolytic celiac plexus block for intractable pain. We describe a rare complication and its treatment and we emphasize the importance of having a guide for the management and treatment of rare complications. We also suggest that every patient be informed about complications, from the most common to the rarest.

Celiac plexus block combined with 125I seeds for refractory epigastric pain from abdominal malignancies: a retrospective case-control study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of celiac plexus block (CPB) combined with 125I seeds implantation (ISI) for refractory epigastric pain from abdominal malignancies. METHODS: The data of 81 patients with refractory epigastric pain [visual analog scale (VAS) score ≥ 4] from abdominal malignancies were collected in this retrospective case-control study. Group A (n = 40) was treated with CPB alone, while Group B (n = 41) underwent CPB combined with ISI. The primary study endpoints were the VAS score, quality of life (QoL), and local tumor control (LTC) rate. The secondary endpoints were complications, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The VAS scores at week 2 (T2), week 4 (T4), week 8 (T8), and week 12 (T12) in both groups were significantly lower compared with the pretreatment values (all P < 0.01). VAS scores in Group B showed a sustained decrease, especially for "mild pain" and "moderate pain," while the VAS scores in Group A rebounded at T8 and T12 (both P < 0.01). The QoL in Group B improved significantly from T4 until T12, which better than that at T12 in Group A (all P < 0.01). The LTC rates at T8 were 35.0% and 92.7% in Groups A and B, respectively, with a significant difference (P < 0.01). Group B had a slightly lower complication rate and a slightly longer median PFS/OS than group A, but neither was statistically different (P = 0.09 and P = 0.99, respectively). CONCLUSION: CPB combined with ISI performs more sustained pain relief (up to 12 weeks) compared to CPB alone, and ultimately improves the patients' QoL.

Long-Term Analgesic Efficacy of Neurolytic Splanchnic Nerve Block via the Transintervertebral Disc Approach to Retrocrural Space: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: The celiac plexus block is effective for treating intractable cancer pain and has been the focus of many studies. At our affiliated institution, fluoroscopy-guided splanchnic nerve block with a single needle via the transintervertebral disc approach was the first choice of treatment. The short-term efficacy of this technique has been reported, but the long-term efficacy is not clear. In the present study, we investigated the long-term analgesic efficacy of this technique. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective, observational study reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent neurolytic splanchnic nerve block (NSNB) via the transintervertebral disc approach for intractable cancer pain at five tertiary hospitals in Japan from April 2005 to October 2020. The primary outcome was the long-term analgesic efficacy of a one-time NSNB via the transintervertebral disc approach. RESULTS: In total, 76 patients were included in the analysis. The median lowest numerical rating scale (NRS) score was 1 within 14 days. At 1, 2, 3, and 6 months after the nerve block, the median NRS score was also ≤ 2, while the median equivalent oral morphine dose did not show any clinically noticeable increase at those times. CONCLUSION: The long-term analgesic efficacy of NSNB via the transintervertebral disc approach in patients with intractable cancer pain has been demonstrated.

The celiac plexus block is effective for treating intractable cancer pain and has been the focus of many studies. The celiac plexus nerve block relieves intractable cancer pain arising from the pancreas or other organs in close proximity, and the splanchnic nerve block is considered clinically equivalent to the celiac plexus block for analgesia. At our affiliated institution, fluoroscopy-guided neurolytic splanchnic nerve block with a single needle via the transintervertebral disc approach is the first choice of treatment because it is technically simpler and less invasive than other approaches. While the short-term efficacy of this technique is known, its long-term efficacy remains unclear. Thus, this multicenter, retrospective, observational study aimed to investigate the long-term analgesic efficacy of a neurolytic splanchnic nerve block via the transintervertebral disc approach. The medical records of patients in whom intractable cancer pain was managed using this technique at five tertiary hospitals in Japan were analyzed. The primary outcome was the long-term analgesic efficacy of a one-time neurolytic splanchnic nerve block via the transintervertebral disc approach. The median lowest numerical rating scale score was 1 within 14 days. At 1, 2, 3, and 6 months after the nerve block, the median numerical rating scale score was also ≤ 2, while the median equivalent oral morphine dose did not show any clinically noticeable increase at those times. This technique may reduce opioid dose and associated side effects compared with long-term conventional pharmacotherapy alone.

Iatrogenic Cushing's From Celiac Plexus Blocks for Chronic Pancreatitis: A Case Report.

Chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic malignancies can result in chronic pain that is difficult to treat with traditional regimens. Various pain management strategies have been implemented to improve the quality of life for patients with these conditions, but these strategies are limited by their efficacy and side effects, including opiate dependence. Celiac plexus blocks (CPB) and celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) were implemented to decrease opiate dependency and treat chronic pain for pancreatitis and pancreatic malignancy. Numerous approaches are used to facilitate CPB/CPN, including percutaneous, surgical, and endoscopic, guided as computerized tomography (CT), fluoroscopy, ultrasound (US), or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) techniques. EUS is the latest development in CPB/CPN and the least commonly utilized method; however, it is highly efficacious and associated with minimal complications and/or risks. With endoscopic CPB/CPN, overall mortality improves. Despite the various complications associated with other techniques, no case report or current literature has documented the development of iatrogenic Cushing's disease from the use of steroids during CPB via any approach. Herein, we report the first case of iatrogenic Cushing's disease from CPB in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis. Future studies are warranted to examine the agents used in the chemical destruction for CPB/CPN, to avoid complications such as this.

EUS-guided interventional therapies for pancreatic diseases.

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is an integrated diagnostic technique merging endoscope and ultrasound to examine the digestive system. EUS has emerged as a primary diagnostic method for pancreatic diseases due to its distinctive benefits. Over the past four decades, EUS has undergone a transformation, shifting its role from primarily diagnostic to increasingly therapeutic. Additionally, in recent years, EUS has emerged as an increasingly prominent adjunctive or alternative approach to conventional surgical interventions. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of current technological approaches in the treatment of pancreatic diseases. The dynamic interplay with diverse therapeutic approaches has reinvigorated EUS and shaped its trajectory in the management of pancreatic diseases.

EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis for pancreas cancer - Finally established or still under review?

Patients with pancreas cancer must deal frequently with intractable and refractory pain. Endoscopic ultrasound guided-celiac plexus neurolysis (EUS-CPN) has been the most studied and used therapeutic technique aimed to destroy the pain fibres that allow the pancreas to communicate with the central nervous system. A neurolytic agent, most commonly ethanol, is optimally spread around the celiac axis in order to reduce pain and mitigate narcotic requirements. This can be performed early to prevent the spiral of pain and medication use, or more historically as salvage therapy. Different techniques to best administer the ethanol for effective EUS-CPN are still being debated. New EUS-guided injection techniques with radiofrequency, radioactive, and/or chemotherapeutic agents need more study.

Comparison of analgesic effect in celiac plexus neurolysis: Ethanol injection with or without iodine-125 radioactive seeds implantation.

Context: Currently, short-term recurrence of pain is the biggest clinical challenge of celiac plexus neurolysis for patients with refractory abdominal cancer pain. Aim: To evaluate the analgesic effect and safety of celiac plexus neurolysis using ethanol injection combined with iodine-125 (125I) radioactive seed implantation for refractory abdominal cancer pain. Settings and Design: The study was a randomized controlled trial. Methods and Materials: About 10 patients with severe refractory abdominal cancer pain were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly divided into group A (ethanol injection combined with 125I radioactive seed implantation, n = 5) and group B (ethanol injection alone, n = 5). The primary end point was pain relief measured by means of numerical rating scale (NRS). And the secondary end point was mean administration of analgesic drugs and the safety of the procedure. Statistical Analysis Used: Repeated measures of analysis of variance were used for statistical analysis. Results: The NRS scores were significantly reduced by 24 h postprocedure in both groups (group A: P = 0.001 and group B: P = 0.001). Group A did not show significant recurrence based on NRS scores during the follow-up period. In contrast, the NRS scores recurred significantly in group B by 1 month postprocedure (P = 0.026). The intake of analgesic drugs was significantly reduced in both the groups postprocedure (group A: P = 0.013 and group B: P = 0.013). Overall, it was significantly lower in group A than in group B (P = 0.041). No treatment-related deaths or major complications were observed. Conclusions: Celiac plexus neurolysis using ethanol injection in combination with 125I radioactive seed implantation has a longer analgesic duration than using ethanol injection alone. It could be a safe and long-lasting analgesic approach for managing refractory abdominal cancer pain.

Computed tomography-guided single celiac plexus neurolysis analgesic efficacy and safety: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of computed tomography (CT)-guided single celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) with the injection of a neurolytic agent into the celiac plexus in one session (CT-guided single CPN). METHODS: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web were searched for English or Japanese articles published up to February 2022, which reported findings about patients who underwent CT-guided single CPN. The outcome measures assessed in the systematic review and meta-analysis were the pain measurement scales from 0 to 10 before and after the intervention and the rate of minor and major complications. RESULTS: The pooled pain measurement scales at pre-intervention and 1- or 2-, 7-, 30-, 60-, 90-, and 180-day post-intervention was 6.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.77-9.46, I2 = 98%), 2.31 (95% CI 2.31-4.44, I2 = 92%), 2.84 (95% CI 1.39-5.79, I2 = 95%), 3.36 (95% CI 1.66-6.77, I2 = 98%), 3.19 (95% CI 1.44-7.08, I2 = 59%), 3.87 (95% CI 1.88-7.97, I2 = 0%), and 3.40 (95% CI 3.02-3.83, I2 = not applicable), respectively. The pooled minor complication rates of diarrhea, hypotension, nausea or vomiting, and pain associated with the procedure were 18% (95% CI 8-37%, I2 = 45%), 16% (95% CI 2-58%, I2 = 76%), 6% (95% CI 2-16%, I2 = 1%), and 7% (95% CI 2-21%, I2 = 17%), respectively. There was no major complication in the included studies. CONCLUSION: CT-guided single CPN can be performed safely and provides immediate analgesic efficacy although the amount of heterogeneity is characterized as large. Further investigation of its long-term analgesic efficacy is required.

Celiac Plexus Cryoneurolysis.

Intractable, chronic abdominal pain from upper abdominal malignant and benign diseases is a significant challenge for healthcare providers and burden on the healthcare system. While opioid analgesics are commonly used to provide pain relief, the adverse effects of chronic opioid use cannot be overlooked. Celiac plexus neurolysis via chemical or thermal means represents an alternative minimally invasive approach to provide palliative pain relief and increase patients' quality of life. Through the use of computed tomography guidance, celiac plexus neurolysis can be performed by accurately targeting the celiac plexus, while minimizing risks to adjacent structures. Historically, celiac plexus neurolysis was performed via instillation of ethanol or phenol; however, within the past decade cryoablation has gained increasing use with potentially fewer side effects.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of celiac plexus neurolysis for abdominal pain associated with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) has been developed as adjunctive therapy to medical management (MM) of abdominal pain associated with unresectable pancreatic cancer. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to obtain updated and more accurate evidence on the efficacy of additional types of CPN, including endoscopic ultrasound-guided CPN (EUS-CPN). METHODS: On March 16, 2021, we performed searches of PubMed, Web of Science, and CENTRAL for original randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We defined the primary outcome as a standardized pain intensity score with a range of 0-10, and evaluated the mean difference between the CPN + MM and MM groups at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the initiation of treatment. We used a random-effects model to synthesize the mean differences across RCTs. RESULTS: We selected 10 RCTs involving 646 individuals. The synthesized mean difference in the pain intensity score between the CPN + MM and MM groups was -0.58 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.09 to -0.07) (p = 0.034) in favor of CPN + MM at 4 weeks, -0.46 (95%CI: -1.00 to 0.08) (p = 0.081) at 8 weeks, and - 1.35 (95%CI: -3.61 to 0.92) (p = 0.17) at 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: This updated meta-analysis of CPN demonstrates its efficacy for managing abdominal pain at 4 weeks. Although there are various limitations, when abdominal pain in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer is poorly controlled with MM alone, CPN should be an option even if the duration of effect is short-lived, taking into account the absence of serious adverse events.

Comparison Between Two Volumes of 70% Alcohol in Single Injection Ultrasound-Guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Pain due to inoperable upper abdominal malignancies is a challenging condition that needs a multimodal analgesic regimen to be managed properly. Celiac plexus alcohol neurolysis was proved to be effective in relieving such type of pain; however, there is no consistent data about the optimal volume to be used to maintain the balance between the neurolytic effect and the destructive effect of alcohol. OBJECTIVES: We aim to compare the analgesic effect of 2 different volumes of alcohol to improve the outcome of interventional management. STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized controlled double-blinded interventional clinical trial. SETTING: Single university hospital. METHODS: Thirty-two patients who suffered from abdominal pain due to unresectable abdominal malignancies were randomly allocated to receive in a single injection ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) with injection of either 20 mL 70% alcohol (CPN20 group) or 40 mL 70% alcohol (CPN40 group). The primary outcome was the post-procedure pain score, while the secondary outcomes included the post-procedure total daily opioid consumption and quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding visual analog scale (VAS) scores at all time points (P-value > 0.05); however, comparisons in each group revealed significantly reduced VAS scores at all time points following the intervention when compared to the baseline. Daily morphine equivalent consumption doses showed statistically significant differences between the baseline and each time point in both groups (P value < 0.05), with no significant difference between both groups at each time point (P value > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the study groups regarding all domains in quality of life assessment at all time points (P value > 0.05). The scores of most time points in all domains were different significantly when compared to the baseline readings in both groups, with a tendency to decline over time in both groups approaching the baseline values. LIMITATIONS: This was a single-center study with a relatively small sample size. Further prospective, multicenter, randomized, and controlled studies with a larger sample size are required to confirm the effects in this study. CONCLUSIONS: During ultrasound-guided CPN for patients with inoperable upper abdominal cancers who failed medical management, a volume of 20 mL is as effective as 40 mL of 70% alcohol regarding pain control, opioid consumption, quality of life, and procedure-related complications.